Monday, April 28, 2014

The Sanctuary as seen in the Psalms


Within the broad spectrum of Christianity there is one doctrine alone that seems unique to the Seventh-day Adventist Church, and that is to do with Christ’s work in the heavenly sanctuary. A sub-set of the doctrine is that of the Investigative Judgment which is supposed to have commenced in 1844 when Jesus moved to a ministry in the sanctuary’s holy of holies as a precursor to the Second Advent. This teaching has come under attack both outside and inside the Church and continues to be a divisive issue for Adventists.

It is not my purpose here to give a critique of the doctrine. It is technical, based on an understanding of the yearly rituals of the Old Testament sanctuary as described in the Books of Moses, an interpretation of parts of the New Testament book of Hebrews, apocalyptic prophecies in Daniel and Revelation, an obscure Hebrew word in Daniel and an historic date that is challenged. These latter in particular I am not prepared to discuss as it all comes down to a matter of which  learned doctor one believes.

There is one thing I will say regarding the Investigative Judgement. The way it has been used by some Adventist evangelists can strike fear into one’s heart. ‘Who knows, tonight, at this very moment, you may be being judged. And if you are not right with God then it may be too late. Tonight, right now, surrender your heart to Jesus.’ Well, what if He has just crossed you off the list? According to the evangelist’s theology once you’re crossed off your doom is sealed.

Not to worry. According to Adventist theology there is no eternally burning hell fire so you won’t fry forever. Maybe that is why some evangelists use this approach – they can’t fear you into the kingdom with the threat of hell fire so they must rely on some other perversion of Scripture.

 Now I am prepared to concede that the Church’s basic understanding of the doctrine may be correct. After all, there is clear reference in the Book of Hebrews to a sanctuary in heaven and the Book of Revelation is rich with Old Testament sanctuary imagery. But if it is correct there are other references to the sanctuary in the Bible, especially the Psalms, that help give a completely different picture to that given by evangelists as described above.

Interestingly, the first use of the word ‘sanctuary’ in Scripture appears in Exodus 15. God has just led Israel through the Red Sea. The waters have closed over the Egyptian pursuers and now the people celebrate their deliverance. Moses leads the people in singing, recounting God’s mighty deeds and looking forward to the time God will bring them safely to the Promised Land.

You will bring them in and plant them on your own mountain — the place, O Lord, reserved for your own dwelling, the sanctuary, O Lord, that your hands have established. (Ex.15:17)

This verse finds a parallel in Psalm 114:2: ‘the land of Judah became God’s sanctuary, and Israel became his kingdom.’

In the above the mountain of God, the place reserved for His dwelling, and the sanctuary, are one and the same. It is the place where the Israelites were to find rest, to be free from the fear of their enemies, to prosper and enjoy long life. The word ‘sanctuary’ itself implies a place of refuge, of protection, a safe place. 

The word ‘sanctuary’ appears 22 times in the Psalms. Here it is overwhelmingly a place of safety, the place where God dwells and where He acts to protect His people, or from which He hears their cries of distress. A selection of these is discussed below.

The sanctuary is synonymous with the dwelling place of God:
  • Ps. 15:1 ‘Who may worship in your sanctuary, Lord? Who may enter your presence on your holy hill?
  • Ps. 26:8 ‘I love your sanctuary, Lord, the place where your glorious presence dwells.’
  • Ps. 63:2 ‘I have seen you in your sanctuary and gazed upon your power and glory.’
It is on earth: 
  • Ps. 78:69 ‘There he built his sanctuary as high as the heavens, as solid and enduring as the earth.’ When see in the context of Psalm 68 this clearly refers to Mount Zion.
  • Ps 68:17 ‘Surrounded by unnumbered thousands of chariots, the Lord came from Mount Sinai into his sanctuary.’ Again, a clear reference to Mount Zion.
  • Ps 74:3,7 ‘Walk through the awful ruins of the city; see how the enemy has destroyed your sanctuary … They burned your sanctuary to the ground. They defiled the place that bears your name.’
And in heaven:
  • Ps. 102:19 ‘Tell them the Lord looked down from his heavenly sanctuary. He looked down to earth from heaven.’
  • Ps. 150:1 ‘Praise the Lord! Praise God in his sanctuary; praise him in his mighty heaven!’
 In times of trouble the Psalmist turns to God in his sanctuary:
  • Ps. 18:6 ‘But in my distress I cried out to the Lord; yes, I prayed to my God for help. He heard me from his sanctuary; my cry to him reached his ears.’
  • Ps. 28:2 ‘Listen to my prayer for mercy as I cry out to you for help, as I lift my hands toward your holy sanctuary.’
 It is a place where God provides refuge for His people, a safe place:
  • Ps. 27:5 ‘For he will conceal me there [in His temple] when troubles come; he will hide me in his sanctuary. He will place me out of reach on a high rock.’
  • Ps. 61:4 ‘Let me live forever in your sanctuary, safe beneath the shelter of your wings!’
 How do these ideas of refuge, safety, of the sanctuary as the place from which God hears the prayers of His people, align with other Biblical teaching on judgment? When the evidence is considered I believe there is harmony.

The Old Testament prophet Daniel had a series of visions. These are recorded in the book that bears his name. In chapter 7 he sees four strange beasts come up out of the sea. We are not left to guess the meaning of the visions for the interpretation is given in the same chapter. The first three beasts represent the kingdoms of Babylon, Medo-Persia, and Greece. The fourth is not identified but given the sequential nature of the first three it must follow Greece. This beast has generally been identified as Rome. There are some things worth noting about this animal:

  • It is the last power of the vision, and it continues until God intervenes in world affairs to establish His eternal kingdom.
  • He is ‘different from the other beasts …’ It is described as terrifying, cruel, destructive and universal.
  • It has 10 horns, and from amongst these arises another horn that uproots three others. This horn is proud, arrogant and blasphemous. He defies God, tries to change God’s laws, oppresses God’s people and has authority over them.
Babylon, Medo-Persia and Greece all ruled over the ‘Holy Land’.  Under Nebuchadnezzar Babylon destroyed God’s temple and carried His people into exile. None of these however are described in the same terms as the fourth power. It alone is described in terms of warfare with God, challenging His authority and oppressing His people. Unlike the other beasts this one has eschatological connotations.

As this beast rails against God and continues his destructive ways on earth a court convenes in heaven.  The Scripture says that ‘the books were opened’ (Dan. 7:10), which can only mean that the evidence is being examined. This is an open and transparent process with millions of witnesses.

The scene is not like our criminal courts where the alleged criminal stands accused before the judge for a crime against the state. It is more aligned with our civil courts where the judged is asked to rule in favour of one citizen over another, such as when one sues another for injury or other loss. The two parties in this case are the people of God and the Little Horn Power. In this case the court rules in favour of God’s people (v.22). The beast that ruled the world is stripped of its power and this is transferred to God’s people who will rule the earth forever (v.22, 26-27).

Unlike the scene portrayed by the evangelist above, the picture is not one of an individual standing before the judge having to answer for his or her crimes. Rather, it is that of a group of people seeking redress for a wrong committed against them. God acts from heaven, His dwelling place, His sanctuary, to deliver His people from oppression and injustice and to restore to them dominion over the earth, the dominion that was lost when Adam sinned. For those who believe, the judgement is not an event to be feared. Rather, it is something to look forward to with joyful expectation.

The book of Revelation was first heard by first century Christians who were being persecuted by Rome. Its message brought assurance that those who remained faithful to God would ultimately be vindicated and rewarded and that tyranny and oppression would end. Throughout the book the focus shifts between events on earth and events in heaven. On earth we see apostasy, persecution, and calamity. Above there is assurance that God remains in control, that His purpose is being fulfilled on earth, and that the future of His people is assured. They will emerge triumphant over the forces of darkness.

Sanctuary imagery is found throughout Revelation. The ‘seven golden lampstands’ (Rev. 1:12), the ‘Lamb that looked as if it had been slaughtered’ (5:6), the martyrs under the altar (6:9), ‘his Temple’ (7:15), incense (8:4) and ‘the Ark of his covenant’ (11:19) are a few examples. Those that ‘died in the great tribulation … stand in front of God’s throne and serve him  day and night in his Temple’ (Rev.7:14, 15). God’s throne is in His Temple, or His sanctuary. Here He dwells and from here He rules the universe.

The prayers of His people ascend to the throne (Rev. 8:3,4). God proclaims His judgements on the earth from the Temple (Rev. 16:1-7). Those that overcome, that is, remain faithful to Jesus through turmoil and persecution, are seen standing before Him in front of the Throne (Rev. 7:9). In Revelation 14 three angels are seen flying in the midst of Heaven, dispatched from the Throne. They have good news to proclaim, and that is that the time has come for God to judge. These angels call the faithful out of Babylon, which represents all that are opposed to God, so that they will not partake in her punishment.

The picture portrayed in Revelation echoes that of the Psalms. God reigns from His sanctuary. From here He hears the prayers of His faithful people as they endure tribulation on earth. He acts in response to those prayers to assure, comfort and rescue His people.

In Psalm 73:17 the Psalmist writes: ‘Then I went into your sanctuary, O God, and I finally understood the destiny of the wicked’. It may appear that the wicked rule the earth and that there is no real point in standing up for justice and righteousness. But those who look to the sanctuary have the assurance that justice and righteousness will finally triumph and that God will act to judge evil.

Today too many people are fleeing oppression and persecution to seek refuge, or sanctuary, in a safe land. We understand that a sanctuary is a place of safety. The same is true of God’s sanctuary. It is where He dwells and from where He acts to protect, to provide a safe place for His people. Any doctrine, any presentation of the Heavenly Sanctuary which evokes fear, which presents a harsh and judgemental God, is a perversion of the Truth. For in the time of trouble, the time of Judgment, the Sanctuary is a safe refuge for those who flee to it. Those that are held safe in the sanctuary during the time of judgement will emerge triumphant, and inherit the earth made new. This is what the Sanctuary is all about.

Copyright Notice
Scripture quotations are taken from the Holy Bible, New Living Translation, copyright © 1996, 2004. Used by permission of Tyndale House Publishers, Inc., Wheaton Illinois 60189. All rights reserved






Saturday, April 5, 2014

The Oskar Schindler Enigma


Oskar Schindler fascinates me, not so much for what he did but because what he did raises a question that goes to a fundamental tenant of Christianity.  There are Christians who would say that Schindler is lost, that is, condemned to burn in hell forever, because he never confessed the Lord Jesus Christ as his personal saviour. But paradoxically he demonstrates a heart like that of God.

To quote the Jewish Virtual Library, Schindler 'was born Catholic, but from an early age he inhabited a world of sin. His exploits with women are the stuff of barroom legend.' A gambler, he squandered the family fortune. Married to Emile, he was never short a mistress or two. A member of the Nazi party, when the Germans marched into Poland he followed, becoming involved in the black market and the underworld. He made friends with the local high ranking Gestapo, winning them over with women and illicit grog.  With their help he acquired a factory and staffed it with cheap Jewish labour. Hardly a model citizen.

 As Schindler was exposed to the actions of the Nazis in Poland his attitude changed. He became determined to do whatever he could to defeat the system. His factory became a sanctuary for Jews. They were well treated and well fed. Schindler manipulated his network with the Nazis to the advantage of his Jews. He made defective bullets for the German war effort. Thomas Keneally, quoted in the Jewish Virtual Library, says, “He negotiated the salvation of his 1,300 Jews by operating right at the heart of the system using all the tools of the devil - bribery, black marketeering and lies”. He is now honoured by the Jews as a 'Righteous Gentile.'

The Holocaust was not the first time the Jews had faced genocide. Purim celebrates Jewish salvation from their enemies at the time of the Medo-Persian Empire and the bravery of a young Jewish woman, Esther. Her story, recorded in the Old Testament book that bears her name, goes something like this.

Xerxes the Great obviously liked a party. In the third year of his reign he put on a celebration for the high ranking people of his kingdom that went for 180 days. This gave him the opportunity to show everyone how rich and magnificent he was. After this he put on another do for all the people living in the Citadel of Susa - his capital. Again, this was an opulent display lasting seven days and every man could drink as much as he liked. The women had their own function, hosted by the Queen Vashti.

Now Vashti was a very attractive woman and on the last day an intoxicated Xerxes sent for the Queen so that all the men could perv on her beauty. Vashti however must have been an early feminist for she refused to be paraded before a courtyard full of drunken men. Her refusal could not be tolerated for it set a bad example. If she got away with this then every woman in the kingdom might feel empowered to disobey her husband. An example had to be made of Vashti and she was immediately deposed.

So the search for a new queen commenced. Beautiful young virgins were brought from all over the kingdom to begin a 12 month course of beauty treatments after which one would be chosen as queen. One of these was a Jewish girl, Esther, who had been adopted by her cousin Mordecai following the death of her parents. Mordecai and Esther were residents of Susa.

Following Mordecai's advice Esther hid her Jewish identity. This could only mean one thing - she was not true to the Jewish religion for, apart from anything else, their rules about diet set them apart. Then there was the matter of their Sabbath observance and other feast days, monotheism and other practices.

When the time came to select the Queen each of the virgins was presented in turn to the king. After spending the night with him they would take their place among his concubines and they would not spend another night with the king unless 'he had especially enjoyed her and requested her by name'. When Esther's turn came she pleased Xerxes so much that he immediately had her crowned queen. On her cousin's advice she continued to hide her true identity.

Mordecai had a job in the palace. One day a nasty piece of work, Haman, was promoted to the highest position in the kingdom next to the king. Mordecai refused to give Haman the respect due his position and this enraged him. When he discovered Mordecai was a Jew he conspired to have the king issue an edict that all Jews would be killed about a year later. According to the rules of the Medes and Persians, once a royal edict had been proclaimed it could not be repealed. The Jews were doomed.

Having contributed to the predicament his people were in Mordecai sought to enlist Esther's help to lobby the king on their behalf. She was reluctant, for to approach the king without being summoned was to risk death. Only if the king extended the gold scepter in such a circumstance would the individual be spared. Thirty days had passed since Esther had been summoned - after all, Xerxes had more than his fair share of the most beautiful women in the empire to keep him happy.

However, Mordecai presented a rather persuasive argument - you are a Jew and if you think you will be spared from this edict, think again. To cut the story short, Esther approached the king, he extended the gold scepter, and the rest is history. In an ironic twist Haman was hanged on a gallows he had built for Mordecai and the king issued another edict granting the Jews the right not only to defend themselves, but to 'kill, slaughter and annihilate' anyone who tried to kill them and to take the property of their enemies.

Two heroes who came to the rescue of the Jews, one recent the other well over 2,000 years ago. Both celebrated. Both individuals who to all intents and purposes were not living up to anything like the ideal presented in the Bible.

There is a significant difference. By approaching the king without being summoned Esther risked death. She could have reasoned that her true identity might not have been discovered and gambled on that. Or she could have reasoned that to wait till she was summoned gave her longer to live and that while ever life continued there was some hope that circumstances could change. Hers was an act of courage, but she had all to gain and possibly nothing lose.

Schindler, on the other hand, had nothing to gain and everything to lose. He could have traded on, exploited his Jewish labour, and secreted away the wealth he may have accumulated. Exposure meant one thing - death.

Every ANZAC day at services all over Australia the words of Jesus are read out: 'Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends' (John 15:13). This is the highest ideal of Christianity - and, I suspect - of human kind. It is this ideal that was exemplified by Oskar Schindler - the heavy drinking, adulterous, gambler and black marketeer. On this point he demonstrated a heart after that of Jesus Christ. And if, on this point alone he is judged, surely he will walk the streets of gold.

The Bible is full of heroes who, by the standards of 'good Christians', do not measure up. But who are we to judge - to present our neatly packed theology of salvation, determining the criteria on which people are saved. Aren't we better off leaving that to God who reads our hearts and understands our situations, opportunities and motives? Who knows who we might meet in the earth made new.